Enterprise Java

Google Guava Cache with regular expression patterns

Quite recently I’ve seen a nice presentation about Google Guava and we came to the conclusion in our project that it could be really interesting to use the its Cache functionallity. Let us take a look at the regexp Pattern class and its compile function. Quite often in the code we can see that each time a regular expression is being used a programmer is repeatidly calling the aforementioned Pattern.compile() function with the same argument thus compiling the same regular expression over and over again. What could be done however is to cache the result of such compilations – let us take a look at the RegexpUtils utility class:
 
 
 

RegexpUtils.java

01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
package pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.utils;
 
import com.google.common.cache.CacheBuilder;
import com.google.common.cache.CacheLoader;
import com.google.common.cache.LoadingCache;
 
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
 
import static java.lang.String.format;
 
public final class RegexpUtils {
 
    private RegexpUtils() {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException("RegexpUtils is a utility class - don't instantiate it!");
    }
 
    private static final LoadingCache<String, Pattern> COMPILED_PATTERNS =
            CacheBuilder.newBuilder().build(new CacheLoader<String, Pattern>() {
                @Override
                public Pattern load(String regexp) throws Exception {
                    return Pattern.compile(regexp);
                }
            });
 
    public static Pattern getPattern(String regexp) {
        try {
            return COMPILED_PATTERNS.get(regexp);
        } catch (ExecutionException e) {
            throw new RuntimeException(format("Error when getting a pattern [%s] from cache", regexp), e);
        }
    }
 
    public static boolean matches(String stringToCheck, String regexp) {
        return doGetMatcher(stringToCheck, regexp).matches();
    }
 
    public static Matcher getMatcher(String stringToCheck, String regexp) {
        return doGetMatcher(stringToCheck, regexp);
    }
 
    private static Matcher doGetMatcher(String stringToCheck, String regexp) {
        Pattern pattern = getPattern(regexp);
        return pattern.matcher(stringToCheck);
    }
 
}

As you can see the Guava’s LoadingCache with the CacheBuilder is being used to populate a cache with a new compiled pattern if one is not found. Due to caching the compiled pattern if a compilation has already taken place it will not be repeated ever again (in our case since we dno’t have any expiry set). Now a simple test

GuavaCache.java

01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
package pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache;
 
import com.google.common.base.Stopwatch;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.utils.RegexpUtils;
 
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
 
import static java.lang.String.format;
 
public class GuavaCache {
    private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(GuavaCache.class);
    public static final String STRING_TO_MATCH = "something";
 
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(1);
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(10);
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(100);
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(1000);
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(10000);
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(100000);
        runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(1000000);
    }
 
    private static void runTestForManualCompilationAndOneUsingCache(int firstNoOfRepetitions) {
        repeatManualCompilation(firstNoOfRepetitions);
        repeatCompilationWithCache(firstNoOfRepetitions);
    }
 
    private static void repeatManualCompilation(int noOfRepetitions) {
        Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch().start();
        compileAndMatchPatternManually(noOfRepetitions);
        LOGGER.debug(format("Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [%d] ms, no of iterations [%d]", stopwatch.elapsedMillis(), noOfRepetitions));
    }
 
    private static void repeatCompilationWithCache(int noOfRepetitions) {
        Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch().start();
        compileAndMatchPatternUsingCache(noOfRepetitions);
        LOGGER.debug(format("Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [%d] ms, no of iterations [%d]", stopwatch.elapsedMillis(), noOfRepetitions));
    }
 
    private static void compileAndMatchPatternManually(int limit) {
        for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
            Pattern.compile("something").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something1").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something2").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something3").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something4").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something5").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something6").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something7").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something8").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
            Pattern.compile("something9").matcher(STRING_TO_MATCH).matches();
        }
    }
 
    private static void compileAndMatchPatternUsingCache(int limit) {
        for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something1");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something2");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something3");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something4");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something5");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something6");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something7");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something8");
            RegexpUtils.matches(STRING_TO_MATCH, "something9");
        }
    }
 
}

We are running a series of tests and checking the time of their execution. Note that the results of these tests are not precise due to the fact that the application is not being run in isolation so numerous conditions can affect the time of the execution. We are interested in showing some degree of the problem rather than showing the precise execution time. For a given number of iterations (1,10,100,1000,10000,100000,1000000) we are either compiling 10 regular expressions or using a Guava’s cache to retrieve the compiled Pattern and then we match them against a string to match. These are the logs:

01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [1] ms, no of iterations [1]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [35] ms, no of iterations [1]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [1] ms, no of iterations [10]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [0] ms, no of iterations [10]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [8] ms, no of iterations [100]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [3] ms, no of iterations [100]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [10] ms, no of iterations [1000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [10] ms, no of iterations [1000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [83] ms, no of iterations [10000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [33] ms, no of iterations [10000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [800] ms, no of iterations [100000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [279] ms, no of iterations [100000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:34 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression [7562] ms, no of iterations [1000000]
pl.grzejszczak.marcin.guava.cache.GuavaCache:40 Time needed to compile and check regexp expression using Cache [3067] ms, no of iterations [1000000]

You can find the sources over here under the Guava/Cache directory or go to the url https://bitbucket.org/gregorin1987/too-much-coding/src
 

Do you want to know how to develop your skillset to become a Java Rockstar?
Subscribe to our newsletter to start Rocking right now!
To get you started we give you our best selling eBooks for FREE!
1. JPA Mini Book
2. JVM Troubleshooting Guide
3. JUnit Tutorial for Unit Testing
4. Java Annotations Tutorial
5. Java Interview Questions
6. Spring Interview Questions
7. Android UI Design
and many more ....
I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy

Marcin Grzejszczak

Senior Java Developer with team building and managing skills. Enthusiast of JVM languages (Groovy, Scala) and clean coding
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Back to top button