Drools decision tables with Camel and Spring
As I’ve shown it in my previous post JBoss Drools are a very useful rules engine. The only problem is that creating the rules in the Rule language might be pretty complicated for a non-technical person. That’s why one can provide an easy way for creating business rules – decision tables created in a spreadsheet!
In the following example I will show you a really complicated business rule example converted to a decision table in a spreadsheet. As a backend we will have Drools, Camel and Spring.To begin with let us take a look at our imaginary business problem. Let us assume that we are running a business that focuses on selling products (either Medical or Electronic). We are shipping our products to several countries (PL, USA, GER, SWE, UK, ESP) and depending on the country there are different law regulations
concerning the buyer’s age. In some countries you can buy products when you are younger than in others. What is more depending on the country from which the buyer and the product comes from and on the quantity of products, the buyer might get a discount. As you can see there is a substantial number of conditions needed to be fullfield in this scenario (imagine the number of ifs needed to program this).
Another problem would be the business side (as usual). Anybody who has been working on a project knows how fast the requirements are changing. If one entered all the rules in the code he would have to redeploy the software each time the requirements changed. That’s why it is a good practice to divide the business logic from the code itself. Anyway, let’s go back to our example. To begin with let us take a look at the spreadsheets (before that it is worth taking a look at the JBoss website with precise description of how the decision table should look like): The point of entry of our program is the first spreadsheet that checks if the given user should be granted with the possibility of buying a product (it will be better if you download the spreadsheets and play with them from Too Much Coding’s repository at Bitbucket: user_table.xls and product_table.xls, or Github user_table.xls and product_table.xls):
user_table.xls (tables worksheet)
Once the user has been approved he might get a discount:
product_table.xls (tables worksheet)
product_table.xls (lists worksheet)
As you can see in the images the business problem is quite complex. Each row represents a rule, and each column represents a condition. Do you remember the rules syntax from my recent post? So you would understand the hidden part of the spreadsheet that is right above the first visible row:
The rows from 2 to 6 represent some fixed configuration values such as rule set, imports ( you’ve already seen that in my recent post) and functions. Next in row number 7 you can find the name of the RuleTable. Then in row number 8 you have in our scenario either a CONDITION or an ACTION – so in other words either the LHS or rhe RHS respectively. Row number 9 is both representation of types presented in the condition and the binding to a variable. In row number 10 we have the exact LHS condition. Row number 11 shows the label of columns. From row number 12 we have the rules one by one. You can find the spreadsheets in the sources.
Now let’s take a look at the code. Let’s start with taking a look at the schemas defining the Product and the User.
Person.xsd
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | <? xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" ?> < xsd:include schemaLocation = "user.xsd" /> < xsd:element name = "Product" > < xsd:complexType > < xsd:sequence > < xsd:element name = "Name" type = "xsd:string" /> < xsd:element name = "Type" type = "ProductType" /> < xsd:element name = "Price" type = "xsd:double" /> < xsd:element name = "CountryOfOrigin" type = "CountryType" /> < xsd:element name = "AdditionalInfo" type = "xsd:string" /> < xsd:element name = "Quantity" type = "xsd:int" /> </ xsd:sequence > </ xsd:complexType > </ xsd:element > < xsd:simpleType name = "ProductType" > < xsd:restriction base = "xsd:string" > < xsd:enumeration value = "MEDICAL" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "ELECTRONIC" /> </ xsd:restriction > </ xsd:simpleType > </ xsd:schema > |
User.xsd
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 | <? xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" ?> < xsd:include schemaLocation = "product.xsd" /> < xsd:element name = "User" > < xsd:complexType > < xsd:sequence > < xsd:element name = "UserName" type = "xsd:string" /> < xsd:element name = "UserAge" type = "xsd:int" /> < xsd:element name = "UserCountry" type = "CountryType" /> < xsd:element name = "Decision" type = "DecisionType" /> < xsd:element name = "DecisionDescription" type = "xsd:string" /> </ xsd:sequence > </ xsd:complexType > </ xsd:element > < xsd:simpleType name = "CountryType" > < xsd:restriction base = "xsd:string" > < xsd:enumeration value = "PL" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "USA" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "GER" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "SWE" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "UK" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "ESP" /> </ xsd:restriction > </ xsd:simpleType > < xsd:simpleType name = "DecisionType" > < xsd:restriction base = "xsd:string" > < xsd:enumeration value = "ACCEPTED" /> < xsd:enumeration value = "REJECTED" /> </ xsd:restriction > </ xsd:simpleType > </ xsd:schema > |
Due to the fact that we are using maven we may use a plugin that will convert the XSD into Java classes.
part of the pom.xml
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 | < build > < pluginManagement > < plugins > < plugin > < groupId >org.apache.maven.plugins</ groupId > < artifactId >maven-compiler-plugin</ artifactId > < version >2.5.1</ version > </ plugin > </ plugins > </ pluginManagement > < plugins > < plugin > < groupId >org.codehaus.mojo</ groupId > < artifactId >jaxb2-maven-plugin</ artifactId > < version >1.5</ version > < executions > < execution > < id >xjc</ id > < goals > < goal >xjc</ goal > </ goals > </ execution > </ executions > < configuration > < packageName >pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model</ packageName > < schemaDirectory >${project.basedir}/src/main/resources/xsd</ schemaDirectory > </ configuration > </ plugin > </ plugins > </ build > |
Thanks to this plugin we have our generated by JAXB classes in the pl.grzejszczak.marcin.decisiontable.model package. Now off to the drools-context.xml file where we’ve defined all the necessary beans as far as Drools are concerned:
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 | <? xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" ?> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd <!-- Grid Node identifier that is registered in the CamelContext --> < drools:grid-node id = "node1" /> < drools:kbase id = "productsKBase" node = "node1" > < drools:resources > < drools:resource type = "DTABLE" source = "classpath:rules/product_table.xls" /> </ drools:resources > </ drools:kbase > < drools:ksession id = "productsKSession" name = "productsKSession" type = "stateless" kbase = "productsKBase" node = "node1" /> < drools:kbase id = "usersKBase" node = "node1" > < drools:resources > < drools:resource type = "DTABLE" source = "classpath:rules/user_table.xls" /> </ drools:resources > </ drools:kbase > < drools:ksession id = "usersKSession" name = "usersKSession" type = "stateless" kbase = "usersKBase" node = "node1" /> </ beans > |
As you can see in comparison to the application context from the recent post there are some differences. First instead of passing the DRL file as the resource inside the knowledge base we are providing the Decision table (DTABLE). I’ve decided to pass in two seperate files but you can provide one file with several worksheets and access those worksheets (through the decisiontable-conf element). Also there is an additional element called node. We have to choose an implementation of the Node interface (Execution, Grid…) for the Camel route to work properly as you will see in a couple of seconds in the Spring application context file.
applicationContext.xml
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | <? xml version = "1.0" encoding = "UTF-8" ?> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring/camel-spring-2.8.0.xsd"> < import resource = "classpath:drools-context.xml" /> <!-- Show Spring where to search for the beans (in which packages) --> < context:component-scan base-package = "pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable" /> < camel:camelContext id = "camelContext" > < camel:route id = "acceptanceRoute" > < camel:from uri = "direct:acceptanceRoute" /> < camel:to uri = "drools:node1/usersKSession" /> </ camel:route > < camel:route id = "discountRoute" > < camel:from uri = "direct:discountRoute" /> < camel:to uri = "drools:node1/productsKSession" /> </ camel:route > </ camel:camelContext > </ beans > |
As you can see in order to access the Drools Camel Component we have to provide the node through which we will access the proper knowledge session. We have defined two routes – the first one ends at the Drools component that accesses the users knowledge session and the other the products knowledge session.
We have a ProductService interface implementation called ProductServiceImpl that given an input User and Product objects pass them through the Camel’s Producer Template to two Camel routes each ending at the Drools components. The concept behind this product service is that we are first processing the User if he can even buy the software and then we are checking what kind of a discount he would receive. From the service’s point of view in fact we are just sending the object out and waiting for the response. Finally having reveived the response we are passing the User and the Product to the Financial Service implementation that will bill the user for the products that he has bought or reject his offer if needed.
ProductServiceImpl.java
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 | package pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service; import org.apache.camel.CamelContext; import org.slf4j.Logger; import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired; import org.springframework.stereotype.Component; import pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product; import pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User; import static com.google.common.collect.Lists.newArrayList; /** * Created with IntelliJ IDEA. * User: mgrzejszczak * Date: 14.01.13 */ @Component ( "productServiceImpl" ) public class ProductServiceImpl implements ProductService { private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ProductServiceImpl. class ); @Autowired CamelContext camelContext; @Autowired FinancialService financialService; @Override public void runProductLogic(User user, Product product) { LOGGER.debug( "Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route" ); camelContext.createProducerTemplate().sendBody( "direct:acceptanceRoute" , newArrayList(user, product)); camelContext.createProducerTemplate().sendBody( "direct:discountRoute" , newArrayList(user, product)); financialService.processOrder(user, product); } } |
Another crucial thing to remember about is that the Camel Drools Component requires the Command object as the input. As you can see, in the body we are sending a list of objects (and these are not Command objects). I did it on purpose since in my opinion it is better not to bind our code to a concrete solution. What if we find out that there is a better solution than Drools? Will we change all the code that we have created or just change the Camel route to point at our new solution? That’s why Camel has the TypeConverters. We have our own here as well. First of all let’s take a look at the implementation.
ProductTypeConverter.java
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 | package pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter; import org.apache.camel.Converter; import org.drools.command.Command; import org.drools.command.CommandFactory; import org.slf4j.Logger; import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; import pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product; import java.util.List; /** * Created with IntelliJ IDEA. * User: mgrzejszczak * Date: 30.01.13 * Time: 21:42 */ @Converter public class ProductTypeConverter { private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ProductTypeConverter. class ); @Converter public static Command toCommandFromList(List inputList) { LOGGER.debug( "Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method" ); return CommandFactory.newInsertElements(inputList); } @Converter public static Command toCommand(Product product) { LOGGER.debug( "Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommand method" ); return CommandFactory.newInsert(product); } } |
There is a good tutorial on TypeConverters on the Camel website – if you needed some more indepth info about it. Anyway, we are annotating our class and the functions used to convert different types into one another. What is important here is that we are showing Camel how to convert a list and a single product to Commands. Due to type erasure this will work regardless of the provided type that is why even though we are giving a list of Product and User, the toCommandFromList function will get executed. In addition to this in order for the type converter to work we have to provide the fully quallified name of our class (FQN) in the /META-INF/services/org/apache/came /TypeConverter file.
TypeConverter
1 | pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter |
In order to properly test our functionality one should write quite a few tests that would verify the rules. A pretty good way would be to have input files stored in the test resources folders that are passed to the rule engine and then the result would be compared against the verified output (unfortunately it is rather impossible to make the business side develop such a reference set of outputs). Anyway let’s take a look at the unit test that verifies only a few of the rules and the logs that are produced from running those rules:
ProductServiceImplTest.java
001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 | package pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools; import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.ReflectionToStringBuilder; import org.apache.commons.lang.builder.ToStringStyle; import org.junit.Test; import org.junit.runner.RunWith; import org.slf4j.Logger; import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired; import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration; import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner; import pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.*; import pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService; import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; /** * Created with IntelliJ IDEA. * User: mgrzejszczak * Date: 03.02.13 * Time: 16:06 */ @RunWith (SpringJUnit4ClassRunner. class ) @ContextConfiguration ( "classpath:applicationContext.xml" ) public class ProductServiceImplTest { private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ProductServiceImplTest. class ); @Autowired ProductService objectUnderTest; @Test public void testRunProductLogicUserPlUnderageElectronicCountryPL() throws Exception { int initialPrice = 1000 ; int userAge = 6 ; int quantity = 10 ; User user = createUser( "Smith" , CountryType.PL, userAge); Product product = createProduct( "Electronic" , initialPrice, CountryType.PL, ProductType.ELECTRONIC, quantity); printInputs(user, product); objectUnderTest.runProductLogic(user, product); printInputs(user, product); assertTrue(product.getPrice() == initialPrice); assertEquals(DecisionType.REJECTED, user.getDecision()); } @Test public void testRunProductLogicUserPlHighAgeElectronicCountryPLLowQuantity() throws Exception { int initialPrice = 1000 ; int userAge = 19 ; int quantity = 1 ; User user = createUser( "Smith" , CountryType.PL, userAge); Product product = createProduct( "Electronic" , initialPrice, CountryType.PL, ProductType.ELECTRONIC, quantity); printInputs(user, product); objectUnderTest.runProductLogic(user, product); printInputs(user, product); assertTrue(product.getPrice() == initialPrice); assertEquals(DecisionType.ACCEPTED, user.getDecision()); } @Test public void testRunProductLogicUserPlHighAgeElectronicCountryPLHighQuantity() throws Exception { int initialPrice = 1000 ; int userAge = 19 ; int quantity = 8 ; User user = createUser( "Smith" , CountryType.PL, userAge); Product product = createProduct( "Electronic" , initialPrice, CountryType.PL, ProductType.ELECTRONIC, quantity); printInputs(user, product); objectUnderTest.runProductLogic(user, product); printInputs(user, product); double expectedDiscount = 0.1 ; assertTrue(product.getPrice() == initialPrice * ( 1 - expectedDiscount)); assertEquals(DecisionType.ACCEPTED, user.getDecision()); } @Test public void testRunProductLogicUserUsaLowAgeElectronicCountryPLHighQuantity() throws Exception { int initialPrice = 1000 ; int userAge = 19 ; int quantity = 8 ; User user = createUser( "Smith" , CountryType.USA, userAge); Product product = createProduct( "Electronic" , initialPrice, CountryType.PL, ProductType.ELECTRONIC, quantity); printInputs(user, product); objectUnderTest.runProductLogic(user, product); printInputs(user, product); assertTrue(product.getPrice() == initialPrice); assertEquals(DecisionType.REJECTED, user.getDecision()); } @Test public void testRunProductLogicUserUsaHighAgeMedicalCountrySWELowQuantity() throws Exception { int initialPrice = 1000 ; int userAge = 22 ; int quantity = 4 ; User user = createUser( "Smith" , CountryType.USA, userAge); Product product = createProduct( "Some name" , initialPrice, CountryType.SWE, ProductType.MEDICAL, quantity); printInputs(user, product); objectUnderTest.runProductLogic(user, product); printInputs(user, product); assertTrue(product.getPrice() == initialPrice); assertEquals(DecisionType.ACCEPTED, user.getDecision()); } @Test public void testRunProductLogicUserUsaHighAgeMedicalCountrySWEHighQuantity() throws Exception { int initialPrice = 1000 ; int userAge = 22 ; int quantity = 8 ; User user = createUser( "Smith" , CountryType.USA, userAge); Product product = createProduct( "Some name" , initialPrice, CountryType.SWE, ProductType.MEDICAL, quantity); printInputs(user, product); objectUnderTest.runProductLogic(user, product); printInputs(user, product); double expectedDiscount = 0.25 ; assertTrue(product.getPrice() == initialPrice * ( 1 - expectedDiscount)); assertEquals(DecisionType.ACCEPTED, user.getDecision()); } private void printInputs(User user, Product product) { LOGGER.debug(ReflectionToStringBuilder.reflectionToString(user, ToStringStyle.MULTI_LINE_STYLE)); LOGGER.debug(ReflectionToStringBuilder.reflectionToString(product, ToStringStyle.MULTI_LINE_STYLE)); } private User createUser(String name, CountryType countryType, int userAge){ User user = new User(); user.setUserName(name); user.setUserCountry(countryType); user.setUserAge(userAge); return user; } private Product createProduct(String name, double price, CountryType countryOfOrigin, ProductType productType, int quantity){ Product product = new Product(); product.setPrice(price); product.setCountryOfOrigin(countryOfOrigin); product.setName(name); product.setType(productType); product.setQuantity(quantity); return product; } } |
Of course the log.debugs in the tests are totally redundant but I wanted you to quickly see that the rules are operational. Sorry for the length of the logs but I wrote a few tests to show different combinations of rules (in fact it’s better too have too many logs than the other way round )
001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 | pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@1d48043[ userName=Smith userAge=6 userCountry=PL decision=< null > decisionDescription=< null > ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@1e8f2a0[ name=Electronic type=ELECTRONIC price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=PL additionalInfo=< null > quantity=10 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductServiceImpl:31 Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Sorry, according to your age (< 18 ) and country (PL) you can't buy this product pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.FinancialServiceImpl:29 Sorry, user has been rejected... pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@1d48043[ userName = Smith userAge = 6 userCountry = PL decision = REJECTED decisionDescription = Sorry , according to your age (< 18) and country (PL) you can't buy this product ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@1e8f2a0[ name = Electronic type = ELECTRONIC price = 1000 .0 countryOfOrigin = PL additionalInfo=<null> quantity=10 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@b28f30[ userName=Smith userAge=19 userCountry=PL decision=< null > decisionDescription=< null > ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@d6a0e0[ name=Electronic type=ELECTRONIC price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=PL additionalInfo=< null > quantity=1 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductServiceImpl:31 Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Sorry, no discount will be granted. pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.FinancialServiceImpl:25 User has been approved - processing the order... pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@b28f30[ userName=Smith userAge=19 userCountry=PL decision=ACCEPTED decisionDescription=Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@d6a0e0[ name=Electronic type=ELECTRONIC price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=PL additionalInfo=Sorry, no discount will be granted. quantity=1 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@14510ac[ userName=Smith userAge=19 userCountry=PL decision=< null > decisionDescription=< null > ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@1499616[ name=Electronic type=ELECTRONIC price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=PL additionalInfo=< null > quantity=8 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductServiceImpl:31 Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Congratulations - you've been granted a 10% discount! pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.FinancialServiceImpl:25 User has been approved - processing the order... pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@14510ac[ userName=Smith userAge=19 userCountry=PL decision=ACCEPTED decisionDescription=Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@1499616[ name=Electronic type=ELECTRONIC price=900.0 countryOfOrigin=PL additionalInfo=Congratulations - you've been granted a 10% discount! quantity=8 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@17667bd[ userName=Smith userAge=19 userCountry=USA decision=< null > decisionDescription=< null > ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@ad9f5d[ name=Electronic type=ELECTRONIC price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=PL additionalInfo=< null > quantity=8 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductServiceImpl:31 Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Sorry, according to your age (< 18 ) and country (USA) you can't buy this product pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.FinancialServiceImpl:29 Sorry, user has been rejected... pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@17667bd[ userName = Smith userAge = 19 userCountry = USA decision = REJECTED decisionDescription = Sorry , according to your age (< 18) and country (USA) you can't buy this product ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@ad9f5d[ name = Electronic type = ELECTRONIC price = 1000 .0 countryOfOrigin = PL additionalInfo=<null> quantity=8 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@9ff588[ userName=Smith userAge=22 userCountry=USA decision=< null > decisionDescription=< null > ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@1b0d2d0[ name=Some name type=MEDICAL price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=SWE additionalInfo=< null > quantity=4 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductServiceImpl:31 Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.FinancialServiceImpl:25 User has been approved - processing the order... pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@9ff588[ userName=Smith userAge=22 userCountry=USA decision=ACCEPTED decisionDescription=Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@1b0d2d0[ name=Some name type=MEDICAL price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=SWE additionalInfo=< null > quantity=4 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@1b27882[ userName=Smith userAge=22 userCountry=USA decision=< null > decisionDescription=< null > ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@5b84b[ name=Some name type=MEDICAL price=1000.0 countryOfOrigin=SWE additionalInfo=< null > quantity=8 ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductServiceImpl:31 Running product logic - first acceptance Route, then discount Route pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.converter.ProductTypeConverter:25 Executing ProductTypeConverter's toCommandFromList method pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.ProductService:8 Congratulations, you are granted a discount pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.FinancialServiceImpl:25 User has been approved - processing the order... pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:150 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.User@1b27882[ userName=Smith userAge=22 userCountry=USA decision=ACCEPTED decisionDescription=Congratulations, you have successfully bought the product ] pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.service.drools.ProductServiceImplTest:151 pl.grzejszczak.marcin.drools.decisiontable.model.Product@5b84b[ name=Some name type=MEDICAL price=750.0 countryOfOrigin=SWE additionalInfo=Congratulations, you are granted a discount quantity=8 ] |
In this post I’ve presented how you can push some of your developing work to your BA by giving him a tool which he can be able to work woth – the Decision Tables in a spreadsheet. What is more now you will now how to integrate Drools with Camel. Hopefully you will see how you can simplify (thus minimize the cost of implementing and supporting) the implementation of business rules bearing in mind how prone to changes they are. I hope that this example will even better illustrate how difficult it would be to implement all the business rules in Java than in the previous post about Drools. If you have any experience with Drools in terms of decision tables, integration with Spring and Camel please feel free to leave a comment – let’s have a discussion on that. All the code is available at Too Much Coding repository at Bitbucket and GitHub.