How much faster is Java 8?

Geoffrey De SmetApril 10th, 2014Last Updated: April 10th, 2014

1 64 2 minutes read

Java SE 8 was released yesterday. Traditionally, every new major JRE version comes with a free performance boost. Do we get another free lunch? And how big is the gain this time?

Let’s benchmark it.

Benchmark methodology

Run the same code with 3 different JRE versions (SunJDK 1.6.0_26, OpenJDK 1.7.0_51 and OpenJDK 1.8.0). The code itself was written for Java 6 (both in syntax and JDK API’s usage) and compiled for Java 6 with OpenJDK 1.7.
Each run takes about 55 minutes.
VM arguments: -Xmx1536M -server
Software: Linux 3.2.0-59-generic-pae
Hardware: Intel® Xeon® CPU W3550 @ 3.07GHz
Each run solves 13 planning problems with OptaPlanner. Each planning problem runs for 5 to minutes. Up to 2 planning problems are solved in parallel.
Solving a planning problem involves no IO (except a few milliseconds during startup to load the input). A single CPU is completely saturated. It constantly creates many short lived objects, and the GC collects them afterwards.
The benchmarks measure the number of scores that can be calculated per millisecond. Higher is better. Calculating a score for a proposed planning solution is non-trivial: it involves many calculations, including checking for conflicts between every entity and every other entity.

To reproduce this benchmark locally, build optaplanner from source and run the main class GeneralOptaPlannerBenchmarkApp.

Benchmark results

Executive summary

My observations:

On the biggest dataset (Machine Reassignment B10), which dwarfs any of the other datasets in size, Java 8 is 20% faster than Java 7, which was already 17% faster than Java 6.
In some cases, Java 8 is slower than Java 7. Specially for the course scheduling datasets, Java 8 is 6% slower than Java 7. Hopefully new releases of Java 8 will resolve this performance regression soon.
On average, Java 8 is only 1% faster than Java 7. This while Java 7 is already 16% faster than Java 6.
Despite that this is the first final release of OpenJDK 8, I did not find any regressions in Java 8. OptaPlanner’s examples are 100% reproducible, so as expected, the different JRE’s give the exact same results at every single iteration.

Raw benchmark numbers

JDK	Cloud balancing 200c	Cloud balancing 800c	Machine reassignment B1	Machine reassignment B10	Course scheduling c7	Course scheduling c8	Exam scheduling s2	Exam scheduling s3	Nurse rostering m1	Nurse rostering mh1	Sport scheduling nl14
SunJDK 1.6.0_26	46462	44963	94567	28655	5473	6989	6954	3785	3232	2948	1977
OpenJDK 1.7.0_51	53683	49798	116553	33733	6182	7848	8243	4606	3645	3377	2445
OpenJDK 1.8.0	54687	51625	135102	40529	5798	7357	8048	4441	3637	3324	2321
6 ⇒ 7	15.54%	10.75%	23.25%	17.72%	12.95%	12.29%	18.54%	21.69%	12.78%	14.55%	23.67%
7 ⇒ 8	1.87%	3.67%	15.91%	20.15%	-6.21%	-6.26%	-2.37%	-3.58%	-0.22%	-1.57%	-5.07%
Dataset scale	120k	1920k	500k	250000k	217k	145k	1705k	1613k	18k	12k	4k

Conclusion

On the big datasets, Java 8 is clearly faster. And this without changing a line of code. On average, the result is less convincing (with the current release), but a free lunch is always welcome.

Reference:

How much faster is Java 8? from our JCG partner Geoffrey De Smet at the OptaPlanner blog.